THE NEGATIONIST “U.S. SENATE MINORITY REPORT”? PURE DISINFORMATION

I publish this post now, some months before Mexico 2010 event, so the people can understand who really the so-called “negationists” are. The “U. S. Senate Minority Report: More Than 650 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global Warming Claims Scientists Continue to Debunk “Consensus” in 2008 (hereinafter called “minority report”) was published at December 2008. The people mentioned in that document as a source of information should be against the evidence that the global warming is mainly due to human activities. Professor Rayner, one of the main experts on climate changes, is mentioned, at page 194 of the “minority report”, as a “source” against anthropogenic nature of the climate change. Since I knew him as an authority in that field, I asked his opinion. This is his reply


Giovanni:
I have been convinced since the late 1980s that climate change is largely anthropogenic and represents a serious strategic challenge for humanity to manage. I have never been a “scientific skeptic” although there have been occasions when I have been critical of overstated confidence for specific projections and the use of extreme scenarios in order to frighten people into taking action.

It is true that I have been consistently critical of the FCCC and Kyoto route for managing the problem of climate change and its impacts.

I have never directly confronted the authors of the “minority report”, although I have twice been asked by journalists about it and in each case I have made my position clear and asked them to convey to the publishers my view that my inclusion is inappropriate. The publishers apparently take the view that being a skeptic of current policy is sufficient to justify my inclusion and have ignored the calls for my removal from the list.

Steve

Steve Rayner
James Martin Professor of Science and Civilization,
Director, Insitute for Science Innovation and Society,
University of Oxford,
Honorary Professor of Climate Change and Society,
University of Copenhagen,

This demonstrates the real nature of that “minority report” : an ideological and disinformation document misrepresenting the people’s positions and statements, as in the case of Professor Rayner.

THE CLIMATE SUMMIT ON FORESTS AND CLIMATE CHANGE

The European Commission started a public consultation on the Green Paper On Forest Protection and Information in the EU: Preparing forests for climate change. The consultation terminated on July 31^st. The Climate Summit European Coordination prepared and submitted to the European Commission a document in reply to that Public Consultation. The document is downloadable here.

RUSSIA: A CLIMATE CHANGE VICTIM

I came back from vacation just to share with all of you my sadness (and anger) for what is happening in Russia. The average temperature in the August period in Russia is 23 degrees Celsius, while now is 32, an extreme high temperature for that latitudes. The heat stoked wildfires that continue to burn out of control and clouded Moscow in smoke. 52 people died. At the TV, President Medvedev announced, "What's happening with the planet's climate right now needs to be a wake-up call to all of us, meaning all heads of state, all heads of social organizations, in order to take a more energetic approach to countering the global changes to the climate." He is right. It's time to change our overall attitude against the climate change. What's happening in Russia is just an example of what will happen if we do not act with adequate policy against the climate change. Let's forget Copenhagen (approach and effect) and let try to solve the problem. I give all the condolence from The Climate Summit Europe to the families of the 52 victims of the wildfires.

ANOTHER EVENT IN AFRICA

The Cameroonian youth green NGO, Vital Action for Sustainable Development (AVD), will organize, on August 3rd and 10th 2010, two videoconference sessions during the 5th World Youth Congress to be held in Istanbul on July 31 to August 13 (www.turkiye2010.org). The videoconferences are aimed to connect youth African organization,s working on sustainable development and climate change, with discussions focused on the Post-COP15 Agenda. They will select 50 youth organizations all over Africa to be ourtheir local partners. For more information, go here .

The 1st African Youth Summit on Climate Change

Jean Paul Brice Affana, a member of The Climate Summit Africa, notified us this important event

The 1st African Youth Summit on Climate Change is organized by African Youth Initiative on Climate Change (AYICC) to serve as an appropriate avenue where African youth can come together and discuss issues relating to various topics on climate change including the role of youth in adaptation and mitigation projects, public awareness and participation, biodiversity and active participation in UNFCCC negotiations. The Summit is open to young people from all over Africa interested and involved in initiatives aimed to tackle climate change and ensure sustainability. It will consist of informative sessions and skills-building workshops on climate change issues ranging from scientific knowledge to effective political advocacy.
This is the online link to apply or use the application form in word.doc format.

Le 1er Sommet de la Jeunesse Africaine sur les Changements Climatiques est organisé par l’Initiative de la Jeunesse Africaine sur les Changements Climatiques (AYICC) afin de servir de rencontre appropriée au cours de laquelle la jeunesse africaine se réunira et discutera des questions et des sujets liés aux changements climatiques, y compris du rôle des jeunes dans les projets d’adaptation et d’atténuation, la prise de conscience publique, la biodiversité et la participation active des jeunes dans les négociations de la Convention-cadres des Nations Unies sur les Changements Climatiques. Le Sommet est ouvert aux jeunes gens originaires d’Afrique intéressés et impliqués dans les initiatives visant à combattre le réchauffement de la Terre et à assurer le développement durable. Il comportera des sessions instructives et des ateliers de renforcement des compétences sur les défis des changements climatiques, avec un accent mis sur l’amélioration des connaissances scientifiques pour un plaidoyer politique plus efficace.
Voici le lien pour postuler ou alors remplissez le formulaire word:


The Organizing Team
AYICC Africa

THE CLIMATE SUMMIT AFRICA - EU JOINT MEETING

The first meeting between The Climate Summit - Europe and The Climate Summit Africa was held online on June 28 in our Meeting Room .
A decision to prepare common materials to educate people on the climate change and sustainability issue was taken. Therefore, an open Joint Africa-EU Group for Climate and Sustainability Education was set-up for that purpose.

If you would like to participate, please contact

Giovanni Macchia g.macchia1@gmail.com, The Climate Summit, Regional Coordinator EU

Taiwo Adewole taiwoadewole@yahoo.com, The Climate Summit, Africa Coordinator

GOOD PRACTICES IN EUROPE.. THE FINNISH EXAMPLE

According to Finnish Forest Research Institute, Finland's forests absorb 42 million tonnes of carbon dioxide a year, which is well over half of Finnish carbon dioxide emissions, which were 70 million tonnes in 2008. This is an excellent example of natural resource usage to solve the climate change problems. The complete report of the Finnish Forest Research Insitute can be read here

CLIMATE CHANGE : THE GREENHOUSE EFFECT - PART 1

Let start to analyze the solar radiation, which we have described in my previous article on the Albedo. First of all, let specify that every body emits electromagnetic radiation. The Earth emits electromagnetic radiation (the terrestrial radiation), the Sun emits electromagnetic radiation (the solar radiation), and so on. The body emitted radiation was studied and explained by Planck, Boltzmann, Wien and others famous physicist of the past (we are speaking of end of ‘800 and beginning of ‘900). Planck derived the formula for the radiation emitted by a black body, where, for the first time, he introduced the concept of quantum. That radiation does not depend from the body properties, but only from its temperature. Figure 1 shows the typical emitted black body radiation vs. its wavelength: the reader can see that when the temperature increases, the radiation wavelength decreases. Since the wavelength is inversely proportional to the radiation energy (I omit the mathematical formulas for the sake of simplicity, since also they can be found on textbooks or wikipedia), the radiations emitted at high energy have a lower wavelength, which corresponds to the ultraviolet spectrum (on the beach or on the mountains, indeed, we protect us from those kind of rays).

Figure 2 shows the incoming radiation measured by the satellites outside the atmosphere: it corresponds to the radiation emitted by a body of 5800 Kelvin degrees, the Sun temperature. Therefore, it is wrong to think (as I read in other contexts) that the electromagnetic radiation arriving on the Earth could derive from the solar system planets, like Jupiter or Saturn: those planets do not have the temperature to emit the radiation spectra measured by the satellites (for example, Jupiter has an average temperature of less than zero degree celsius).

The terrestrial radiation has been measured by satellites and corresponds to a radiation emitted by a body of 290 Kelvin degree (see Figure 3). It is thermal radiation, different from the radiation arriving from the Sun (shown on the left in the figure). The reader could think: “Understood. But what about the greenhouse effect?” If we consider only the solar radiation, the temperature of the Earth should be less than zero Celsius degree (this data was obtained by Fourier in the 1827!!): the temperature on the Earth, as all we know, is much higher. This difference is due to the atmosphere, which reflects the terrestrial radiation on the earth surface, contributing to the temperature increasing. This phenomenon, known also in the last two centuries, is called greenhouse effect (in analogy to what happens in a greenhouse, where the windows reflect the internal heat but are transparent to the visible radiation). The atmospheric gases contributing to this phenomenon are called greenhouse gas. The reader could ask:”What? Not all the gases in the atmosphere reflect the terrestrial radiation? Why?” Some gases, which absorb the terrestrial radiation, “change” their rotational and vibrational state. Those “changes”, according to the quantum mechanics laws, allow the emission of the thermal radiation which is responsible for the terrestrial warming, with an effect “rebound on the Earth”. Fortunately, not all the gases in the atmosphere have that characteristic. The oxygen and the nitrogen, which constitutes the 99% of the atmospheric gases, do not have it while the carbon dioxide, the methane, the ozone, the water vapor and other gases (like the Freon) have it.

We have explained why the greenhouse effect occurs and what the cause is. Let see how the greenhouse effect contributes to the global temperature increase. Figure 4 shows the solar and terrestrial radiation fluxes, measured by satellites.

I will omit the details, but a simple calculation of the incoming and outgoing radiation shows that the Earth warms while the atmosphere cools. Therefore, the greenhouse effect is responsible of the warming (and of the life) of the planet. Anyway, the reader could ask if, in these years, there has been a real planet warming, as reported by several journal and scientific newspaper. Let’s try to explain it with scientific data. The temperature has always been measured by several stations around the world and, from the end of ’70, also by satellites. The mean global temperature, as we can see in Figure 5, is increased, with a trend of 0.2 Celsius degrees per decade.

Is that increase due to the human activities emitting greenhouse gases? The answer seems easy: an increase of the greenhouse gases concentration implies a “rebound” on the Earth surface of a higher quantity of terrestrial radiation and, therefore, an increase of the temperature. However, there are also other questions: which greenhouse gases are the main responsible for the increase? Are they emitted by the human activities or follow a cyclical natural trend? Are there other effects which can increase the global temperature? Those are important questions, not only from a scientific perspective, but also for the economical and environmental policy to choice. I will discuss about them in the next post.

CLIMATE CHANGE - PART 1: THE ALBEDO

This is the first of posts dedicated to describe the main factors driving the warming and climate changes of the Earth. I wull start with the most intuitive of all: the albedo. The Earth and its atmosphere intercept the solar electromagnetic radiation (this radiation “transports” heat and the visible light is only a part of it) and reflect a fraction, called albedo, in the outer space. The Earth becomes colder if the albedo increases, since the quantity of absorbed radiation decreases. Viceversa, the Earth become warming if the albedo decreases: indeed, the absorbed solar radiation increases. In summary: the Earth become cooler if the albedo increases while the Earth become warmer if the albedo decreases. Let’s analyse some natural causes and after let see how the man actions can change the albedo, with consequences on the terrestial temperature and clime.
The snow reflects almost all the solar radiation. Therefore, when the snow melt the albedo decreases and, as a consequence, the temperature increases (remember that when the albedo decreases the temperature increases). The increase of temperature causes the melting of other snow, with further temperature increases. This phenomenon continues until termodynamic equilibrium is reached, but the consequence is an overall increase of the temperature and a further glacier melting. On the contrary, the clouds reflect the solar radiation, contributing to globally increase the albed and to cool the Earth. The aerosols (the particles in the atmposhere caused by natural events, like the volcan eruptions and the sandstorms, or by the man caused pollution) reflect the solar radation, increasing the albedo, also if the reflective power changes as function of it composition.
The antropogenic (i.e. due to the mankind) activities of disforest and agricolture can decrease the albed and, therefore, increase the global temperature. For instance, the trees of the tropical forests are cut and replaced by more black soil for cultivation purposes. In this case, the absorbed solar radiation increases (the darkest colors absorb it while the white reflect the solar radiation) and the temperature increases. The bad management and disforest of lands can contribute to the terrestrial temperature increases. Some satellite images show the city areas with dark building colour are hotter than city areas with gardes and trees, as for the dark soil of the forest. Therefore, the urbanistic policy and the architectural choices can influence the Earth warming.